Department of Architecture
An Overview of the Guide This guide is written expressly for the faculty and students of professional degree programs in architecture. It begins with a brief overview of the parameters for accrediting professional degree programs, including a list of the twelve conditions your program must address to maintain its accreditation. However, the guide's primary purpose is to inform you about one of these conditions, namely the student performance criteria. Every Student must demonstrate competency in these areas to graduate from an accredited architecture program. The criteria define the minimum requirements for your professional education in architecture.
An Overview of NAAB Accreditation
In the United States, most state registration boards require a degree from an accredited professional degree program as a prerequisite for licensure. The National Architectural Accrediting Board (NAAB), which is the sole agency authorized to accredit US professional degree programs in architecture, recognizes two types of degrees: the Bachelor of Architecture and the Master of Architecture. A program may be granted a five-year, three-year, or two-year term of accreditation, depending on its degree of conformance with established educational standards.
Masters degree programs may consist of a pre-professional undergraduate degree and a professional graduate degree, which, when earned sequentially, comprise an accredited professional education. However, the pre-professional degree is not, by itself, recognized .as an accredited degree. The NAAB grants candidacy status to new programs that have developed viable plans for achieving initial accreditation. Candidacy status indicates that a program should be accredited within six years of achieving candidacy, if its plan is properly implemented.
The National Architectural Accrediting Board (NAAB) is the sole agency authorized to accredit US professional degree programs in architecture. Since most state registration boards in the United States require any applicant for licensure to have graduated from a NAAB-accredited program, obtaining such a degree is an essential aspect of preparing for the professional practice of architecture. While graduation from a NAAB-accredited program does not assure registration, the accrediting process is intended to verify that each accredited program substantially meets those standards that, as a whole, comprise an appropriate education for an architect.
The curriculum of a NAAB-accredited program includes general studies, professional studies, and electives, which together comprise a liberal education in architecture. The curriculum ensures that graduates will be technically competent, critical thinkers who are capable of defining multiple career paths within a changing societal context. More specifically, the NAAB requires an accredited program to produce graduates who: are competent in a range of intellectual, spatial, technical, and interpersonal skills; understand the historical, sociocultural, and environmental context of architecture; are able to solve architectural design problems, including the integration of technical systems and health and safety requirements; and comprehend architects' roles and responsibilities in societv. Although the NAAB recognizes that the areas and levels of excellence will vary among programs, all accredited professional degree programs must demonstrate compliance with each of the following twelve NAAB Conditions:
The last condition, Student Performance Criteria, is presented in this guide exactly as it appears in the 1998 Conditions and Procedures, which specifies in detail the requirements of accreditation.
Requirements for Presenting Student Work
During an accreditation site visit, a lockable, reasonably soundproof room must be set tip in your school building so that the visiting team can review and discuss the program's documentation in confidence. Prior to the site visit, the program head usually discusses with the team chair the content and organization of the team room, which must contain fully labeled and easily accessible exhibits of student work. Exhibits must include examples of both minimum pass and high achievement, be of sufficient quantity to ensure that all graduates are meeting the performance criteria, have been executed since the previous site visit, and span no less than a single academic year. If more than one professional degree program is being reviewed, student work from each program Must be clearly distinguishable. While a range of work must be displayed for each required Course, it is not necessary to present the complete Output of a studio, lecture, or seminar. The means of presenting student work is at your program's discretion, but each piece must be cross-reference d to the Course matrix and criteria it addresses, contain the date, and indicate its assessment from minimum to high achievement. Exhibits in spaces outside the team room can augment, but not substitute for, the team room exhibits; they should be identified in a manner that is consistent with the team room displays, except that indications of minimum and high pass may be omitted in public displays. Class assignments must be available for all projects presented, which ideally will furnish examples by several different students or teams. Learning More About Accreditation
For more information about the accrediting process, faculty and students should read the 1998 Conditions and Procedures, referred to as the C and P. You may also be interested in reviewing your program's most recent Architecture Program Report, referred to as the APR, Visiting Report, referred to as the VTR, and the Annual Reports, referred to as the ARs. All these documents can be found in your program's library.
Student Performance Criteria
The program must ensure that all its graduates possess the skills and knowledge defined by the performance criteria set out below, which constitute the minimum requirements for meeting the demands of an internship leading to registration for practice. The program rnust provide evidence that all its gradates have satisfied each criterion through required course work. If transfer credits are granted for courses taken at other Institutions, evidence must be provided that the courses are comparable to those offered in tire program. The list of performance criteria begins with fundamental skills and knowledge, continues with technical skills and knowledge, and concludes with a focus on practice and societal roles. This sequence is intended to foster an integrated approach to learning that cuts across subject categories. These criteria encompass three levels of accomplishment.1 Awareness: familiarity with specific information, Including facts, definitions, concepts, rules, methods, processes, or settings. Students can correctly recall information without necessarily being able to paraphrase or summarize it.
Understanding: assimilation and comprehension of information. Students can correctly paraphrase or summarize information without necessarily being able to relate it to other material or see its fullest implications. Ability: skill in relating specific information to the accomplishment of tasks. Students can correctly select the information that is appropriate to a situation and apply it to the solution of specific problems. The NAAB intends to establish performance criteria that assist programs in preparing students for the broad requirements of the profession, while also encouraging educational practices Suited to the circumstances of particular programs. In addition to assessing whether student performance meets the expectations of professional education outlined by the criteria, the visiting team will also assess performance in relation to the program's stated curricular goals and content. While the NAAB stipulates the student performance criteria that must be satisfied, it specifies neither the educational programs nor the forms of student work that may serve as evidence of having satisfied these criteria. Programs are therefore encouraged to develop unique learning and teaching strategies, methods, and materials to satisfy these criteria. The NAAB will consider innovative methods for satisfying the criteria, provided the program has a formal evaluation process for assessing student achievement of these criteria and documents the results.
The APR Must Include the Following Information:
An overview of the program's curricular goals and content A graphic matrix that cross-references each required course with the performance criterion(a) it fulfills. For the purposes of accreditation, graduating students must demonstrate awareness, understanding, or ability in the following areas:
12.1 Verbal and Writing Skills
12.2 Graphic Skills
12.3 Research Skills
12.4 Critical Thinking Skills
12.5 Fundamental Design Skills
12.6 Collaborative Skills
12.7 Human Behavior
12.8 Human Diversity
12.9 Use of Precedents
12.10 Western Traditions
12.11 Non-Western Traditions
12.12 National and Regional Traditions
12.13 Environmental Conservation
12.14 Accessibility
12.15 Site Conditions
12.16 Formal Ordering Systems
12.17 Structural Systems 12.18 Environmental Systems
12.19 Life-Safety Systems
12.20 Building Envelope Systems
12.21 Building Service Systems
12.22 Building Systems Integration
12.23 Legal Responsibilities
12.24 Building Code Compliance
12.25 Building Materials and Assemblies
12.26 Building Economics and Cost Control
12.27 Detailed Design Development
12.28 Technical Documentation
12.29 Comprehensive Design
12.30 Program Preparation
12.31 The Legal Context of Architecture Practice
12.32 Practice Organization and Management
12.33 Contracts and Documentation
12.34 Professional Internship
12.35 Architects' leadership Roles
12.36 The Context of Architecture
12.37 Ethics and Professional Judgement Awareness of the ethical issues involved in the formation of professional judgments in architecture design and practice
Conclusion
"Serving the educational needs of every student, and the professions they will enter, must remain a top priority In architecture education, but such private concerns, while critically important, are not sufficient. The academic and professional lives of architects must also be grounded in public purpose. Harking back to the three ancient principles of Vitruvius-firmness, commodity, and delight-the education of architects should prepare future practitioners dedicated to building technically sound, visibly pleasing, and useful structures for clients and users, and equally, to making life more comfortable, pleasurable, Secure, and productive for all citizens, including the disenfranchised in our society. The scholarly activities of both faculty and students should relate not only to private goals and agendas, but to matters of consequence to the profession, and beyond that, to society as a whole. No less important than acquiring design skills, technical competence, and business judgment, education must begin to help students develop the ethical grounding, the intellectual roundedness, and the maturity to weigh the impact their work on present users and future generations." -Ernest L. Boyer and Lee D. Mitgang (1996). Building Community; A New Future for Architecture Education and Practice. Princeton: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, p. 145. Hard copies may be obtained from:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
© 2009 School of Architecture and Urban Planning, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. This page last modified December 03, 2008 |