Preparing for the Future Team
This
team is charged with addressing NCA Criterion Two:
The organization’s allocation of resources and its
processes for evaluation and planning demonstrate its
capacity to fulfill its mission, improve the quality of
its education, and respond to future challenges and opportunities.
Core
Component 2a
The organization realistically prepares for a future
shaped by multiple societal and economic trends. |
Core
Component 2b
The organization’s resource base supports
its educational programs and its plans for maintaining
and strengthening their quality in the future. |
Core Component 2c
The organization’s ongoing evaluation and
assessment processes provide reliable evidence of
institutional effectiveness that clearly informs
strategies for continuous improvement. |
Core
Component 2d
All levels of planning align with the organization’s
mission, thereby enhancing its capacity to fulfill
that mission. |
Team
Reflector:
nca-pff@uwm.edu
Committee meeting schedule
- July
17: Informal "meet each other" meeting
- August
25 (during "kickoff sessons"): work
plan, brainstorming on UWM's future
- September
9, 8:00-9:30: working groups start discussion of core components
and data needs
- October
14, 8:00-9:30, Endris 597
- November
11, 8:30-10:00, Endris 597
- December
9, 8:00-9:30, Endris 597
- February
17, 8:00-9:00, Endris 597
Current
status of committee's work
In the later part of the spring semester, the draft report
was written by the co-chairs basd on the input of the working
groups. The draft is currently under review and a revised
version will be available for comments early in the fall semester.
Working
Groups (organized around four core components of NCA guidelines)
- Trends:
The organization realistically prepares for a future shaped
by multiple societal and economic trends
- Members:
Cynthia Hasbrook, Tom Holme, Bill Kritek, Edward Rodriguez,
Jose Torres
- Resources:
The organization's resource base supports its educational
programs and its plans for maintaining and strengthening
their quality in the future.
- Members:
Mark Harris, Jeanne Hewitt, Jennifer McKenzie-Flynn,
Leslie Vansen, ShaRon Williams
- Assessment:
The organization's ongoing evaluation and assessment processes
provide reliable evidence of institutional effectiveness
that clearly inform strategies for continuous improvement.
- Members:
Alan Aycock, Al Ghorbanpoor, Bill Kritek, Bruce Maas,
Linda Whittingham
- Planning:
All levels of planning align with the organization's mission,
thereby enhancing its capacity to fulfill that mission.
- Members:
Mark Harris, Fred Helstetter, Leslie Kren, Mary Kay
Madson, Davey Singer
Useful
Links (on
main accreditation site)
Committee
Members
|
